PDA

View Full Version : who voted not to accept us in sfl ?



dennytrueblue
14-07-2012, 08:52
sorry if this has been covered but i have just read that 29 out of 30 sfl clubs voted to accept us in. who did not want us ?

Brian gray
14-07-2012, 09:37
I would like to know as well m8,if they don't want us in the sfl then they'll not want us going to there ground and filling it. So let's hope they come out and reveal thereselfs I don't think so because they've not got the balls and they really do want our money. So **** them WATP. :roll:

stranraerloyal
14-07-2012, 09:40
I was just looking for a thread covering this , very interested to find out who it was

stranraerloyal
14-07-2012, 09:50
I just heard it may have been Clyde or stranraer , just a rumour a friend heard in the pub last night so please no pelters just saying what he's told me

mrsbluebird
14-07-2012, 09:52
I heard it was Stranraer. What have they against us :confused:

stranraerloyal
14-07-2012, 09:54
I heard it was Stranraer. What have they against us :confused:

If I was I certainly won't be near stair park again just noticed a thread saying its Clyde tho bud

unclemaat
14-07-2012, 09:56
I have stated on a couple of threads lads, CLYDE 100%,

tinkers70
14-07-2012, 09:57
There was a thread on here last night and Clyde and Stranraer were the two names that kept coming up. No-one knew for definate though

Behind enemy lines
14-07-2012, 09:59
Way to focus on the important details lads ! We have been voted into the fourth tier of Scottish football but you want to focus on the 1 team who didnt want us ?

What about how we pay the ****in bills next season, keep the lights on, and put a team on the park ?

Digit
14-07-2012, 09:59
it may be that they know that the arrival of Rangers in their division may reduce their likelihood for promotion.

Not happy that they didnt vote for us from a Rangers perspective, but I can understand why they didnt when it comes to their specific clubs ambitions (so far as moving up a division is concerned).

HMS.Temple.Garden
14-07-2012, 10:00
thought it was 25 of 30.

jockdee
14-07-2012, 10:01
Was it not just because Dundee wasn't allowed to vote?

GBOY
14-07-2012, 10:01
Clyde. That would have been one of the shorter away trips for me.
Oh well f**k them!!!

gboigloyalist
14-07-2012, 10:02
thought it was 25 of 30.

25 out of 30 for div3.

29 out of 30 for sfl membership.

toinfinityandbeyond
14-07-2012, 10:03
thought it was 25 of 30.

29-1 for joining SFL

jigster
14-07-2012, 10:03
it was a secret ballot

weybridgewanderer
14-07-2012, 10:03
Dundee had indicated they would abstain

It does say anyone voted against, just that one team didn't vote for

picalo28
14-07-2012, 10:07
Clyde wanted more clarification as to who was behind Green. He felt there was not enough information on who is behind Green's consortium and have to agree he had a valid point.
Like Whyte, there was not information on him and look where it got us. Green will not name those behind SEVCO.

It's something everyone should have demanded first after the debacle with Whyte's lack of info and background.
Clyde were just concerned and were not wanting to vote in a mysterious consortium so to speak.

crimsonking
14-07-2012, 10:12
Weren't Falkirk to most anti-Rangers re-admission?