PDA

View Full Version : Tim on the radio claiming the game should have been abondoned



Captain_Kirk
20-04-2011, 18:22
:D

We canny be huvving 11 v 8, man

Also claims Naismith should have been red carded for deliberate hand ball

cdrfcbjk
20-04-2011, 18:23
got to love the retards hahaha

switchback
20-04-2011, 18:23
I wonder if he thought the same when we won the cup final with 8 men. Me thinks not...

br1ndy
20-04-2011, 18:24
Deliberate hand ball is a deliberate sending off.

Arguing with proffessionals regarding the ruling hahahahahhaha

Gordy61
20-04-2011, 18:25
Surely these people realise they are making a complete fool of themselves?

Orange_Scott
20-04-2011, 18:25
"aye the refs are like pure huns man, pure cheating and that"
;)

BalmedieBear
20-04-2011, 18:25
thick as the shit they stew in.

Skoosh1873
20-04-2011, 18:26
Wasn't even hand ball it was his shoulder.

Enigma
20-04-2011, 18:26
Last caller
monobrow-check
squint-check
squeaky voice-check

change the rules to suit them...deffo a taig fan.

theGman
20-04-2011, 18:27
Deliberate handball is not a sending off offence.

' Aye it isssssssssss '

****in Knob.

longtimedead
20-04-2011, 18:27
I think he must be red raw from all that hurt oozing ......

colinstein
20-04-2011, 18:31
:D

We canny be huvving 11 v 8, man

Also claims Naismith should have been red carded for deliberate hand ball


you can see where he's coming from

had the game been abandoned we'd have been awarded a 3...0 victory which is one less goal if difference counts....in fact I read somewhere that goals awarded in such circumstances aren't counted at all in the calculation

Positively Blue
20-04-2011, 18:36
Surely these people realise they are making a complete fool of themselves?


No they dont, and stop calling them shirley. ;)

steve_rfc06
20-04-2011, 18:36
Tim on RR stating because Willie Collum's first name he gave penalties to Rangers.

They really don't have a clue!!

ibroxrox
20-04-2011, 18:37
:D

We canny be huvving 11 v 8, man

Also claims Naismith should have been red carded for deliberate hand ball

That will have been one of those hellbhoys!

rangers1chris
20-04-2011, 18:38
i enjoy their pain:)

grangers
20-04-2011, 18:39
Wasn't even hand ball it was his shoulder.

It wasn't a foul, Collum fecked it up :)

hunter1rfc
20-04-2011, 18:40
serious mongs ceptic have had more decisions going for them all season deluded ****in fenian ****

Gordy61
20-04-2011, 18:40
No they dont, and stop calling them shirley. ;)

..........:)

The Predator
20-04-2011, 18:42
Last nights win hurt them big style. They seen our trips to sheepville and tannadump as places we would slip up.

Enigma
20-04-2011, 18:42
Regan on saying this sectarian stuff needs to stop regarding these bomb threats,so he knows who did it :mad:

OldhamLoyal
20-04-2011, 18:42
Please let them drop points tonight, please , please, please, I am enjoying their pain>:)

Der Berliner
20-04-2011, 18:42
BTW, we had a game against Hearts a few years back when they went off by the quarter score too and then the reporter said that one more sending off would see the game abandoned. Never checked the rules, but was a touch concerned after Gomis went. Anyone knows the SFA's rules regarding this?

Captain_Kirk
20-04-2011, 18:45
Regan keeps calling Delahunt 'Darryll' :clap:

Bilbotheblue
20-04-2011, 18:46
BTW, we had a game against Hearts a few years back when they went off by the quarter score too and then the reporter said that one more sending off would see the game abandoned. Never checked the rules, but was a touch concerned after Gomis went. Anyone knows the SFA's rules regarding this?

Need 5 sent off.

THE PROFESSOR
20-04-2011, 18:46
Yet another Timmy who thinks he's a smart-ass. Yet the reality is that if he were a domino, he'd be a double blank.

Rabenutam
20-04-2011, 18:46
See, when I hear them, I wonder why do you want separate schools, if this is the standard that your school system produces .

" Ach, Yev got tae love'm ". Where have all the clowns gone ?

grangers
20-04-2011, 18:49
BTW, we had a game against Hearts a few years back when they went off by the quarter score too and then the reporter said that one more sending off would see the game abandoned. Never checked the rules, but was a touch concerned after Gomis went. Anyone knows the SFA's rules regarding this?

why were you concerned ?, out of curiosity

Enigma
20-04-2011, 18:51
Regan more or less saying they need a list of songs before they take action against clubs and asking the police to give them a list and more or less that's why they haven't acted.

Also saying they recieved an apology from Mcbride and that's it finished,so get it out in the public domain from Mcbride or are they covering up more lies.

Der Berliner
20-04-2011, 18:54
why were you concerned ?, out of curiosity

Leading the game comfortably ... and not knowing whether such a potentially abandoned game has to be replayed or is by default a win to the opposition?

bluestreak
20-04-2011, 18:58
Leading the game comfortably ... and not knowing whether such a potentially abandoned game has to be replayed or is by default a win to the opposition?

You get a 3-0 win but,the goals dont count,so they woulkd still be 8 ahead

Captain_Kirk
20-04-2011, 18:59
A 'Rangers fan' on now saying Lennon is a gentlemen :roll:

Porto Loyal
20-04-2011, 18:59
BTW, we had a game against Hearts a few years back when they went off by the quarter score too and then the reporter said that one more sending off would see the game abandoned. Never checked the rules, but was a touch concerned after Gomis went. Anyone knows the SFA's rules regarding this?

Laws of the Game say no fewer than 7 players to start a game. The Laws don't say for definte how many would get the game abandoned, but the interpretations say:


Although a match may not START if either team consists of fewer than seven
players, the minimum number of players in a team required for a match to
CONTINUE is left to the discretion of member associations. However, it is the
opinion of the International F.A. Board that a match should not continue if
there are fewer than seven players in either team.
If a team has fewer than seven players because one or more players has
deliberately left the fi eld of play, the referee is not obliged to stop the match
and the advantage may be played. In such cases, the referee must not allow
the match to resume after the ball has gone out of play if a team does not
have the minimum number of seven players.



Doesn't need to be all ordered off. You could have 4 sent off, then if the team has used all their subs and has a player taken off through injury, the match shouold be abandoned

Der Berliner
20-04-2011, 18:59
You get a 3-0 win but,the goals dont count,so they woulkd still be 8 ahead

See, I knew somewhere in the back of my mind there was some sort of hitch attached.

Gazman_Airdrie
20-04-2011, 19:00
BTW, we had a game against Hearts a few years back when they went off by the quarter score too and then the reporter said that one more sending off would see the game abandoned. Never checked the rules, but was a touch concerned after Gomis went. Anyone knows the SFA's rules regarding this?

You must have a minimum of 7 players on the field.

grangers
20-04-2011, 19:01
You get a 3-0 win but,the goals dont count,so they woulkd still be 8 ahead

Really ?, that's makes no sense, why would they call it 3-0 if it didn't mean anything ? :confused:

Ach, points is the way to go anyway :D

Captain_Kirk
20-04-2011, 19:01
Jim Duffy saying that the incident has now passed into Rangers territory

BalmedieBear
20-04-2011, 19:06
whenever we win somewhere they think we should slip up they throw the toys out the pram, spit the dummy out and go greetin' tae mammy bernadette.

"it's pyoor no fair, they huns won again!!! the refs a pyoor hun, his names billy collum n'at!"

pelem
20-04-2011, 19:11
what it now looks like is any foul inside the box is a red card, unless it was to show we were getting our fair share of penalties so we can't complain.



I have news for them, we can.